Free the Transcripts: The Case for More Transparency in the Court System

by Placerville Newswire / Aug 02, 2016 / comments

By Lloyd Billingsley -- "Freida Batten, Jim Batten’s first wife and a UC Davis graduate, was outraged that the transcripts were the property of court reporters, and that in cases of acquittal the transcript could be tossed. To recall what someone said in a courtroom thirty years ago, with lives in the balance, there is simply no substitute for the transcript."

Vanguard readers are right that the court system needs more transparency. On that theme, my own experience can provide evidence.

As a crime writer, father and grandfather, I was interested in the case of Colleen Harris of Placerville, who gunned down her husband Bob Harris, a U.S. Forest Service veteran known as “Grandpa Big Bear.” Nearly thirty years earlier, Colleen killed her second husband, Jim Batten, in similar circumstances. I thought it best to start with the Batten murder trial, and that proved educational in ways I did not expect.

I knew that, in the current system, court transcripts are treated as the property of court reporters. Writers have to purchase them, and that can involve great expense. For example, the transcript of the recent Winkler trial in Placerville, (defendant found guilty of murdering his wife) would cost nearly $1800.

Sometimes writers need transcripts even if they are present during testimony, particularly in courtrooms, such as those of Yolo County, that do not allow recording or use of computers. And as I learned, the transcripts do not include the text of video materials shown in the courtroom, such as the interrogation of Daniel Marsh.

I was willing to foot the bill for the transcript of the 1986 Batten trial, but it had an existential problem. Since Colleen Batten was acquitted, California law allows the transcript to be tossed, and that was the fate of the material I sought. El Dorado County prosecutors even tracked down the original court reporter, but she had no copy. This dearth of information would prove significant in the Harris trial.

The defense wanted to invoke the defendant’s prior claim of memory loss, but with the transcript missing, they had to rely on testimony from a journalist who had covered the case for the Mountain Democrat. After so long, that testimony was in effect hearsay, and for both defense and prosecutors it fell far short of what the transcript would have yielded.

Freida Batten, Jim Batten’s first wife and a UC Davis graduate, was outraged that the transcripts were the property of court reporters, and that in cases of acquittal the transcript could be tossed. To recall what someone said in a courtroom thirty years ago, with lives in the balance, there is simply no substitute for the transcript.

Whatever the verdict, nobody should be able to have these transcripts tossed. They belong to the people, not to court reporters, already highly paid for their work. To put this in perspective, imagine the outcry if bailiffs owned the gallery seats and charged reporters and spectators for their use.

What happens in a public courtroom is the property of the people. Every trial should be video and audio recorded in downloadable form. We have the technology, and the message to legislators should be clear:

“What do we want?”

“More transparency in the justice system.”

“When do we want it?”

“Now.”

VIA: http://www.davisvanguard.org/2016/07/free-transcripts-case-transparency-court-system/

Lloyd Billingsley is the author of Killer Confession: Double Murder Dialogue in Davis, California and Shotgun Weddings, about the Placerville case. Exceptional Depravity, his first book on the Marsh trial, appeared in 2014, and this year he published Bill of Writes, a journalism collection.