Placerville Newswire
  • Crime
  • Culture
No Result
View All Result
Get Started
Placerville NewsWire
  • Crime
  • Culture
No Result
View All Result
Placerville NewsWire
No Result
View All Result

ICYMI – Political correctness comes to Hangtown

The truth about lynching myths

Cris Alarcon by Cris Alarcon
March 22, 2026
in Culture, Government
494 31
0
Reviving Hangtown: How Placerville Can Reclaim Its Gold Rush Glory

Historic Landmark

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterWhatsappReddit
Aug. 27, 2020
Daniel Greenfield

Placerville is a pleasant place to spend a day visiting wineries and touring historical buildings from the Gold Rush era. The small California city once did its best to shed the rough days of the mining camps, back when it was known as Dry Diggings or Hangtown, before embracing the image all over again to lure in the tourists.

Placerville’s logo is bordered by rope, its former name, “Old Hangtown,” gets second place on the town seal, and behind the miner panning for gold is a noose hanging from a tree.

You might also like

1855 Map Reveals Old Highway 50 Wagon Route

1855 Map Reveals Old Highway 50 Wagon Route

August 4, 2026
Stephanie Shirkey Sworn In as El Dorado County Judge

Stephanie Shirkey Sworn In as El Dorado County Judge

August 1, 2026

And that noose is the problem.

A Los Angeles Times screed complained about the challenges of bringing “even a whiff of the widespread reckoning on race to the conservative corners of California that need it the most.”

Placerville has 162 black people living there.

But a paranoid symptom of the endless reckoning and wrecking has been finding nooses all over the place. Bubba Wallace thought a pull rope in a NASCAR garage was a noose. White women have mistaken pinatas and swings for nooses while clutching their copies of Robin DeAngelo’s racist anti-racist tract. So there was no way that Hangtown was going to get away.

Placerville was getting rid of Hangtown all over again for the sake of respectability.

A petition falsely claimed that Hangtown “glorifies and celebrates a violent and racist history” and that it suggests that “racial hate crimes are acceptable.”

The Los Angeles Times insisted that “American Indians — along with Chinese immigrants and Mexicans” were the ones being strung up.

“Native people get left out of the conversation, even though, in this case, I feel certain they were the primary victims of mob justice or vigilantism or whatever you want to call it,” Brendan Lindsay, a history professor at Sacramento State, is quoted as saying.

A history professor telling readers what he “feels” happened is not especially reassuring. But history, like Hangtown, is dead. And facts are just dry real things that no one really cares about.

Hangtown got the name after five men tried to rob a Mexican gold prospector named Lopez.

Three of the men were also accused of the previous murder of a Frenchman. One of them was from Chile or, variously, a Spaniard, the other two were described as French.

The three were hung.

The other major hanging at Hangtown took place after a fight between Richard “Irish Dick” Crone and a Chilean miner.

Crone killed his Chilean opponent, and a contingent of Chilean miners took the lead in lynching him. Various accounts have Crone either cursing blasphemously or telling the lynch mob, “Don’t be impatient, gentlemen. I’ll soon give you a fair lay out.”

As in the case of who shot Liberty Valance, you often print the legend.

The gambling hall where Crone committed his murder is a popular Placerville stop for ghost hunters who claim that the boyish New Orleans gambler still haunts it today.

Hangtown got its name from a crime that occurred between, in modern politically correct parlance, Latinos. Its second most famous hanging was championed by Latinos.

Despite all the intersectional rhetoric about “indigenous” people, the Chilean miners were as European as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, and would have killed anyone who said otherwise.

Two of the victims of Hangtown’s two pivotal crimes were from south of the border. Two of the men who were hung were Frenchmen who didn’t speak English. One was Irish.

But in an era when pinatas, pull ropes and swings can be mistaken for nooses, mere facts are weak things to put up against performative emotive hysteria. The Los Angeles Times insists that Placerville needs to make a reckoning with its racist history when it lynched the French and the Irish. And so Hangtown’s name and the noose from its city have to go.

The petition to keep the noose and the name earned three times as many signatures as the petition to take them off. But politicians have stopped listening to voters as well as to the facts.

Placerville got its current name when the city fathers decided to shed its old history for respectability. After revisiting that history for glamor and tourism, they’re shedding it again.

Does it matter to anyone outside Placerville whether it keeps the Hangtown name and noose?

Hangtown’s actual history does have some troubling things for all of us to reckon with. The California mining camps were lawless and multicultural. The wildest western doesn’t even come close to capturing the state of lawlessness or the response by an armed male population.

The rope wasn’t the racist tool of repression by white men against minorities.

People from all across the world arrived during the California Gold Rush. Many didn’t speak English. And many shrugged at robbery and murder. Tribal encampments popped up based on region and language. People grouped together with those of their own kind for security.

Regardless of what a history professor “feels,” everyone lynched and was lynched.

Mexicans, Chileans, Indians, Chinese, black and white men killed and hung each other. Larger parties could assemble for firefights. Vendettas dragged in innocent people of the wrong race.

There were indeed racist massacres, but they weren’t limited to any one side.

In a tribal atmosphere when people didn’t even share a common language, vigilante bands took out an atrocity on any male members of the group, white, Mexican, Indian, that carried it out.

This is why we have police and a justice system.

“That’s ‘justice,’ as in ‘vigilante justice,’ which pairs nicely with the Trump administration’s current, racist re-branding of it as ‘law and order.’” the Los Angeles Times stupidly rants. “Then as now — whether it’s an Indigenous man in what’s now Placerville, labeled by a mob jury as a thief and hanged, or a protester in Portland, labeled by federal agents as violent and grabbed from the streets — it’s the same extrajudicial punishment being unfairly meted out against Black and brown people, and white allies.”

Law and order is the alternative to vigilante justice. It’s what keeps racist violence from taking over. The media and the Democrats oppose judicial punishments for criminals as unfair. But without police and a functional judicial system, vigilante justice, fair or unfair, takes over.

Just ask the folks at CHOP during their Summer of Love.

Black Lives Matter and the racist hate group’s allies, when they aren’t complaining about the noose in Hangtown, want to defund the police and take us back to the California mining camps. And if you think that’s an exaggeration, look at the rising rate of murders in Chicago, Philadelphia, Minneapolis and New York City. It’s the Gold Rush, but with drugs instead of gold.

And while there were few women and children in the California mining camps, there are plenty of them being shot and even killed as collateral damage in gun battles between urban gangs.

Take away the police, and what’s left is crime and vigilante justice.

Like the California camps, urban areas are dangerous, violent and tribal, filled with ethnic and racial groups that don’t share a common language or even a common moral code.

Democrat activists are urging us to imagine a world without police. That’s easy enough to do. Go back in time, tear down the suburbs, the 911 system, prisons, and revert back to a world in which safety comes from being part of an armed group ready to kill or be killed.

Placerville is a warning. Underneath every placid town exterior lies something darker and uglier. Civilization is moral, but it’s also institutional. The California camps were what happened when large multicultural male populations, prone to taking risks, made their own law and security.

America’s major cities, and increasingly some of its towns and suburbs, are the scenes of violent clashes between young risk-taking males who aren’t married and aren’t interested in raising families, but find their own gold rush in selling cocaine, heroin, meth and other drugs.

Defund the police and the history of Hangtown won’t be the past, it’ll be our future.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism.

 

This article was first published by FrontPage Magazine.

Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield is an Israeli-born journalist and columnist with nearly 20 years of experience writing for conservative publications. His work spans national and international stories, covering politics, history, and culture. Throughout his career, he has collaborated with industry legends like David Horowitz, interviewed senators and congressmen, and shared the stories of ordinary people overcoming extraordinary challenges. His first book, Domestic Enemies: The Founding Fathers’ Fight Against the Left, explores the forgotten struggles that shaped America’s early history.

 

Cris Alarcon

Cris Alarcon

Former Member: Executive Board of Directors, Treasurer, Boys & Girl Club of El Dorado County Western Slope. - Former Member: Board of Directors, Treasurer, Food Bank of El Dorado County. - Opening Team Dealer at Red Hawk Casino - Retried EDC Elections Department Inspector. - 2008 Chairman of El Dorado County Charter Review Committee, Youngest Charter Member of the Hangtown Kennel Club. - Political Strategist and Campaign Manager.

Related Stories

1855 Map Reveals Old Highway 50 Wagon Route

1855 Map Reveals Old Highway 50 Wagon Route

by Cris Alarcon
August 4, 2026

Before Highway 50 carried cars through the Sierra Nevada, wagons, horses and freight teams followed this rugged Gold Rush route....

Stephanie Shirkey Sworn In as El Dorado County Judge

Stephanie Shirkey Sworn In as El Dorado County Judge

by Cris Alarcon
August 1, 2026

A new judge has officially joined the El Dorado County Superior Court. Gov. Gavin Newsom's interim appointment allows Judge Stephanie...

SEO-Friendly Title:  Coalition Urges FCC to Protect California Phone Service  High-Impact Subtitle:  Local governments and consumer advocates warn that weakening California’s authority could jeopardize reliable communications for rural communities, including El Dorado County.  Focus Keyphrase: California Carrier of Last Resort  Meta Description: Coalition asks the FCC to preserve California’s authority to protect reliable phone service for rural communities, including El Dorado County.  Social Media Excerpt: Could rural residents lose critical telephone protections? A broad California coalition is urging the FCC to reject a proposal they say could weaken reliable communications for communities like El Dorado County.  4-Sentence Summary  A coalition of local governments, consumer advocates, labor organizations and public interest groups is urging the Federal Communications Commission to reject an AT&T petition that could limit California’s authority over basic telephone service requirements. The filing centers on California’s Carrier of Last Resort rules, which require designated providers to make basic communications service available throughout their service territories. For rural counties such as El Dorado County, the debate carries significant implications for emergency communications, wildfire preparedness and access to reliable voice service. Coalition members argue that California—not federal regulators alone—should retain the authority to ensure residents continue receiving dependable communications services.  Main Article Body  PLACERVILLE, Calif. — A broad coalition of California organizations is asking the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to reject an AT&T petition that opponents say would weaken the state’s ability to guarantee reliable telephone service, particularly in rural communities where dependable communications remain critical during emergencies.  The coalition, led by the Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC), filed comments with the FCC opposing AT&T’s request for federal preemption of California’s Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) requirements. Those rules require designated telecommunications providers to offer basic voice service to customers throughout their assigned service areas.  For El Dorado County residents, the issue extends beyond traditional landline phones.  Many foothill and mountain communities continue to experience limited cellular coverage, frequent Public Safety Power Shutoffs, severe winter storms and wildfire-related outages. During those events, reliable voice communications can become a lifeline for residents seeking emergency assistance, contacting family members or receiving evacuation information.  According to the California Public Utilities Commission, Carrier of Last Resort obligations are technology-neutral. Providers may use fiber, wireless or Voice over Internet Protocol technologies, provided they continue delivering reliable basic communications service that meets state standards.  The coalition argues that AT&T’s petition asks the FCC to override California’s authority to enforce those protections.  “California’s Carrier of Last Resort requirements remain essential to ensuring reliable communications services for all residents,” the coalition stated in its filing, arguing that federal regulators lack the authority to invalidate the state’s consumer protections.  AT&T has argued that maintaining its aging copper telephone network costs approximately $1 billion annually in California while serving only a small percentage of customers. The company says newer technologies—including fiber and wireless services—can provide faster and more reliable communications in many areas.  California regulators disagree that modernization alone justifies ending existing obligations.  In filings before both the FCC and federal court, the California Public Utilities Commission contends that modern communications networks are important but must not come at the expense of vulnerable residents who continue relying on dependable voice service. The agency has argued that AT&T has not demonstrated that every affected customer would have an equivalent replacement service available.  The issue carries particular significance across El Dorado County.  While communities such as El Dorado Hills and Cameron Park generally enjoy multiple communications options, residents in more remote areas—including portions of Georgetown, Grizzly Flats, Somerset, Pollock Pines and the Crystal Basin region—often face limited wireless coverage due to rugged terrain and forested landscapes. During wildfire evacuations or prolonged power outages, communications resilience becomes a matter of public safety.  RCRC, which represents 40 rural California counties, argues that weakening California’s authority could disproportionately affect residents living in those communities. The organization says local governments have a strong interest in ensuring communications infrastructure remains reliable for emergency response, economic activity and access to essential services.  The FCC has not yet issued a final decision on AT&T’s petition. The outcome could influence how California regulates universal telephone service as the telecommunications industry continues transitioning away from legacy copper networks toward fiber and wireless technologies.  For El Dorado County residents, local officials and emergency managers will likely continue monitoring the proceeding closely, given the county’s recurring wildfire risk, mountainous terrain and ongoing reliance on dependable communications during disasters.  Public documents:  California Public Utilities Commission Carrier of Last Resort proceeding: https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/colr FCC public docket regarding AT&T’s petition (available through the FCC Electronic Comment Filing System). Social Promotion  #ElDoradoCounty #Placerville #California #PublicSafety #Telecommunications

SEO-Friendly Title: Coalition Urges FCC to Protect California Phone Service High-Impact Subtitle: Local governments and consumer advocates warn that weakening California’s authority could jeopardize reliable communications for rural communities, including El Dorado County. Focus Keyphrase: California Carrier of Last Resort Meta Description: Coalition asks the FCC to preserve California’s authority to protect reliable phone service for rural communities, including El Dorado County. Social Media Excerpt: Could rural residents lose critical telephone protections? A broad California coalition is urging the FCC to reject a proposal they say could weaken reliable communications for communities like El Dorado County. 4-Sentence Summary A coalition of local governments, consumer advocates, labor organizations and public interest groups is urging the Federal Communications Commission to reject an AT&T petition that could limit California’s authority over basic telephone service requirements. The filing centers on California’s Carrier of Last Resort rules, which require designated providers to make basic communications service available throughout their service territories. For rural counties such as El Dorado County, the debate carries significant implications for emergency communications, wildfire preparedness and access to reliable voice service. Coalition members argue that California—not federal regulators alone—should retain the authority to ensure residents continue receiving dependable communications services. Main Article Body PLACERVILLE, Calif. — A broad coalition of California organizations is asking the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to reject an AT&T petition that opponents say would weaken the state’s ability to guarantee reliable telephone service, particularly in rural communities where dependable communications remain critical during emergencies. The coalition, led by the Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC), filed comments with the FCC opposing AT&T’s request for federal preemption of California’s Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) requirements. Those rules require designated telecommunications providers to offer basic voice service to customers throughout their assigned service areas. For El Dorado County residents, the issue extends beyond traditional landline phones. Many foothill and mountain communities continue to experience limited cellular coverage, frequent Public Safety Power Shutoffs, severe winter storms and wildfire-related outages. During those events, reliable voice communications can become a lifeline for residents seeking emergency assistance, contacting family members or receiving evacuation information. According to the California Public Utilities Commission, Carrier of Last Resort obligations are technology-neutral. Providers may use fiber, wireless or Voice over Internet Protocol technologies, provided they continue delivering reliable basic communications service that meets state standards. The coalition argues that AT&T’s petition asks the FCC to override California’s authority to enforce those protections. “California’s Carrier of Last Resort requirements remain essential to ensuring reliable communications services for all residents,” the coalition stated in its filing, arguing that federal regulators lack the authority to invalidate the state’s consumer protections. AT&T has argued that maintaining its aging copper telephone network costs approximately $1 billion annually in California while serving only a small percentage of customers. The company says newer technologies—including fiber and wireless services—can provide faster and more reliable communications in many areas. California regulators disagree that modernization alone justifies ending existing obligations. In filings before both the FCC and federal court, the California Public Utilities Commission contends that modern communications networks are important but must not come at the expense of vulnerable residents who continue relying on dependable voice service. The agency has argued that AT&T has not demonstrated that every affected customer would have an equivalent replacement service available. The issue carries particular significance across El Dorado County. While communities such as El Dorado Hills and Cameron Park generally enjoy multiple communications options, residents in more remote areas—including portions of Georgetown, Grizzly Flats, Somerset, Pollock Pines and the Crystal Basin region—often face limited wireless coverage due to rugged terrain and forested landscapes. During wildfire evacuations or prolonged power outages, communications resilience becomes a matter of public safety. RCRC, which represents 40 rural California counties, argues that weakening California’s authority could disproportionately affect residents living in those communities. The organization says local governments have a strong interest in ensuring communications infrastructure remains reliable for emergency response, economic activity and access to essential services. The FCC has not yet issued a final decision on AT&T’s petition. The outcome could influence how California regulates universal telephone service as the telecommunications industry continues transitioning away from legacy copper networks toward fiber and wireless technologies. For El Dorado County residents, local officials and emergency managers will likely continue monitoring the proceeding closely, given the county’s recurring wildfire risk, mountainous terrain and ongoing reliance on dependable communications during disasters. Public documents: California Public Utilities Commission Carrier of Last Resort proceeding: https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/colr FCC public docket regarding AT&T’s petition (available through the FCC Electronic Comment Filing System). Social Promotion #ElDoradoCounty #Placerville #California #PublicSafety #Telecommunications

by Cris Alarcon
July 31, 2026

Could rural residents lose critical telephone protections? A broad California coalition is urging the FCC to reject a proposal they...

Lake Tahoe Summit Returns for 30th Annual Gathering

Lake Tahoe Summit Returns for 30th Annual Gathering

by Cris Alarcon
July 31, 2026

Three decades of collaboration to protect Lake Tahoe will be celebrated Aug. 19 as elected officials, tribal leaders and conservation...

Recommended

EDSO Eagle

EDC Arrests and Activity on March 12 2024

March 13, 2024
EDSO Eagle

El Dorado County Sheriff Reports 56 Incidents and 19 Arrests on March 6, 2025

March 7, 2025

Popular Story

  • EDSO Eagle

    El Dorado County Arrest Blotter: Aug. 1, 2026

    697 shares
    Share 279 Tweet 174
  • Man Found Dead on Placerville Main Street

    692 shares
    Share 277 Tweet 173
  • El Dorado County Arrest Blotter: Aug. 2, 2026

    678 shares
    Share 271 Tweet 170
  • El Dorado County Arrest Blotter: July 30, 2026

    670 shares
    Share 268 Tweet 168
  • Mallard Apartments Faces Lawsuits as Leasing Begins

    666 shares
    Share 266 Tweet 167
  • Buy JNews
  • Support Forum
  • Pre-sale Question
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Placerville Newswire Commentary is produced by the Placerville Newswire, a private service focusing on Placerville Local Area issues. All conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). You may find us in El Dorado County Placerville, CA 95667

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Landing Page
  • Buy JNews
  • Support Forum
  • Pre-sale Question
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Placerville Newswire Commentary is produced by the Placerville Newswire, a private service focusing on Placerville Local Area issues. All conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). You may find us in El Dorado County Placerville, CA 95667