As the race for El Dorado County District 4 supervisor begins to intensify ahead of the June 2 primary election, newly filed campaign finance records show candidate Greg Clark entered spring with more than $10,500 cash on hand after raising over $18,000 during the opening months of 2026.
According to California Form 460 filings submitted April 23, Clark’s committee — “Greg Clark for Board of Supervisors 2026” — reported $15,373.20 in monetary contributions and another $2,746.92 in nonmonetary support between Jan. 1 and April 18.
The campaign reported total expenditures of $7,727.45, including direct spending and accrued expenses, leaving an ending cash balance of $10,597.86.
The District 4 seat is open following the decision by Supervisor Lori Parlin not to seek reelection. Four candidates are currently competing for the position.
Clark’s largest reported contribution came from Parlin herself, who donated $2,500 to the campaign in February. Other notable donors included Coloma business owner Arnie Chandola, Placerville executive Laura Jensen and Lotus resident Richard Weiss, each contributing about $1,000.
The filing reflects a donor base heavily concentrated in El Dorado County communities including Placerville, Coloma, Shingle Springs, Pilot Hill and Camino, while also drawing support from Sacramento-area attorneys, consultants and state employees.
Campaign spending remained comparatively restrained during the reporting period.
The committee’s largest expenses included:
- $1,487.81 in candidate filing and ballot fees paid to El Dorado County Elections
- $1,350 for campaign signs
- Smaller expenditures tied to campaign literature, thank-you notes, fundraising events and civic donations
The campaign reported no spending on polling, television, radio advertising or campaign consultants during the filing period.
Instead, the operation appeared to rely heavily on volunteer labor and in-kind support. Among the nonmonetary contributions reported were photography services, campaign event hosting, vehicle use for advertising and campaign T-shirts.
One unpaid expense remained outstanding at the end of the reporting period — $105.19 owed for website domain and hosting services.
Clark’s campaign website describes the candidate as “a father and school board leader raised in El Dorado County” focused on preserving rural character, strengthening public safety and promoting community-centered leadership.
Under California law, Form 460 filings are required for recipient committees to disclose campaign contributions and expenditures. The forms are overseen by the California Fair Political Practices Commission.
Public filings reviewed for this story are available through The Ballot Book campaign finance database and the FPPC’s public reporting system.
Summary of Contributions Report
Committee: Greg Clark for Board of Supervisors 2026
Candidate: Greg Clark
Office Sought: El Dorado County Board of Supervisors, District 4
FPPC Form 460 Filing ID: 216682511
Reporting Period: January 1, 2026 – April 18, 2026
Financial Snapshot
- Total Monetary Contributions: $15,373.20
- Total Nonmonetary Contributions: $2,746.92
- Total Contributions Received: $18,120.12
- Total Expenditures Made: $7,727.45
- Ending Cash Balance: $10,597.86
- Outstanding Debts: $105.19
Major Donors and Notable Contributions
Largest Monetary Contributions
| Donor | Occupation | City | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Parlin | Supervisor | Shingle Springs | $2,500.00 |
| Nathan Ferris | Unemployed | Camino | $250 cash + $1,600 nonmonetary |
| Costen Hickman | Client Success | Sunnyvale | $1,041.98 |
| Arnie Chandola | Business Owner | Coloma | $1,041.98 |
| Laura Jensen | Executive | Placerville | $1,041.98 |
| Richard Weiss | Retired | Lotus | $1,000.00 |
| Howard Penn | Business Management | Coloma | $500 cash + $500 in-kind |
Geographic Breakdown
The fundraising base leaned heavily toward:
- Placerville
- Coloma
- Shingle Springs
- Sacramento
- Broader Northern California professional networks
Several contributions also came from:
- Oakland
- Sunnyvale
- Pasadena
- Las Vegas
- San Francisco
- Ladera Ranch
Donor Profile Trends
The donor list reflects support from:
- Retirees
- State employees
- Attorneys
- Consultants
- Local business owners
- Government officials
- Public-sector professionals
A notable pattern is the significant number of contributors tied to:
- California state government
- Legal professions
- Public administration
- Democratic-aligned political and consulting circles
Retired residents also formed a visible portion of local support throughout rural El Dorado County communities.
Nonmonetary Contributions
The campaign reported $2,746.92 in in-kind support, including:
| Contributor | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Howard Penn | Food/Venue for campaign event | $500.00 |
| Nanci’s Screen Printing | Campaign T-shirts | $358.22 |
| Nathan Ferris | Photography services | $1,600.00 |
| Sam Parlin | Vehicle use for campaign advertising | $288.70 |
Spending and Cash Position
The committee reported:
- $4,875.34 in direct payments
- $105.19 in accrued unpaid expenses
- No loans received
- No loans made
With more than $10,500 cash on hand at the close of the reporting period, the campaign entered the next filing cycle with a solid reserve relative to its early fundraising phase.
Overall Assessment
The filing shows a campaign built primarily on:
- Individual contributions rather than PAC money
- Moderate-dollar donations
- Support from local political figures and professionals
- Strong in-kind volunteer and service support
The largest single financial endorsement came from Supervisor Lori Parlin, whose $2,500 contribution stood out as the campaign’s top reported cash donation during the period.
Summary of Contributions Report
Committee: Greg Clark for Board of Supervisors 2026
Candidate: Greg Clark
Office Sought: El Dorado County Board of Supervisors, District 4
FPPC Form 460 Filing ID: 216682511
Reporting Period: January 1, 2026 – April 18, 2026
Financial Snapshot
- Total Monetary Contributions: $15,373.20
- Total Nonmonetary Contributions: $2,746.92
- Total Contributions Received: $18,120.12
- Total Expenditures Made: $7,727.45
- Ending Cash Balance: $10,597.86
- Outstanding Debts: $105.19
Major Donors and Notable Contributions
Largest Monetary Contributions
| Donor | Occupation | City | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Parlin | Supervisor | Shingle Springs | $2,500.00 |
| Nathan Ferris | Unemployed | Camino | $250 cash + $1,600 nonmonetary |
| Costen Hickman | Client Success | Sunnyvale | $1,041.98 |
| Arnie Chandola | Business Owner | Coloma | $1,041.98 |
| Laura Jensen | Executive | Placerville | $1,041.98 |
| Richard Weiss | Retired | Lotus | $1,000.00 |
| Howard Penn | Business Management | Coloma | $500 cash + $500 in-kind |
Geographic Breakdown
The fundraising base leaned heavily toward:
- Placerville
- Coloma
- Shingle Springs
- Sacramento
- Broader Northern California professional networks
Several contributions also came from:
- Oakland
- Sunnyvale
- Pasadena
- Las Vegas
- San Francisco
- Ladera Ranch
Donor Profile Trends
The donor list reflects support from:
- Retirees
- State employees
- Attorneys
- Consultants
- Local business owners
- Government officials
- Public-sector professionals
A notable pattern is the significant number of contributors tied to:
- California state government
- Legal professions
- Public administration
- Democratic-aligned political and consulting circles
Retired residents also formed a visible portion of local support throughout rural El Dorado County communities.
Nonmonetary Contributions
The campaign reported $2,746.92 in in-kind support, including:
| Contributor | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Howard Penn | Food/Venue for campaign event | $500.00 |
| Nanci’s Screen Printing | Campaign T-shirts | $358.22 |
| Nathan Ferris | Photography services | $1,600.00 |
| Sam Parlin | Vehicle use for campaign advertising | $288.70 |
Summary of Expenditures Report
Committee: Greg Clark for Board of Supervisors 2026
Candidate: Greg Clark
Reporting Period: January 1, 2026 – April 18, 2026
Overall Spending Totals
- Total Payments Made: $4,875.34
- Outstanding Unpaid Expenses: $105.19
- Total Campaign Expenditures: $4,980.53
The campaign operated with relatively modest early-cycle spending, focusing primarily on ballot access, campaign signage, literature, and community engagement expenses.
Breakdown of Expenditures
Filing and Ballot Fees
The single largest category of spending involved official election filing costs paid to El Dorado County Elections.
| Payee | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| El Dorado County Elections | Candidate filing/ballot fees | $838.84 |
| El Dorado County Elections | Candidate filing/ballot fees | $648.97 |
Total Filing Fees: $1,487.81
This represented roughly 30% of all campaign expenditures during the reporting period.
Campaign Materials and Visibility
| Payee | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Minutemen Press | Campaign paraphernalia/misc. | $107.82 |
| Christopher Stanich | Campaign signs | $1,350.00 |
| Volution Gallery | Thank-you notes for volunteers and contributors | $162.38 |
Total Campaign Literature/Materials: $1,620.20
The sign expenditure to Christopher Stanich was the campaign’s largest single operational expense outside filing fees.
Community and Civic Spending
The campaign also spent funds supporting local venues and organizations.
| Payee | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Thrive | Civic donation | $163.76 |
| Pilot Hill Grange | Civic donation | $120.00 |
| ActBlue | Civic donation/processing | $250.00 |
| Shingle Springs Community Center | Civic donation | $116.95 |
Total Civic/Community Spending: $650.71
These expenditures suggest an emphasis on local visibility and relationship-building through community organizations and event participation.
Fundraising and Event Costs
| Payee | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Rosies | Fundraising event expense | $134.00 |
The campaign reported minimal fundraising overhead during the period.
Outstanding Debt
The committee reported one unpaid accrued expense:
| Creditor | Purpose | Outstanding Balance |
|---|---|---|
| George Cilley | Website domain and hosting fees | $105.19 |
This was categorized as a WEB expenditure and remained unpaid at the close of the reporting period.
Spending Analysis
The expenditure pattern reflects a lean early-stage local campaign operation focused on:
- Getting on the ballot
- Building name recognition through signage
- Maintaining community presence
- Keeping overhead relatively low
Notably absent were large expenditures for:
- Consultants
- Polling
- Digital advertising
- Mail campaigns
- Paid campaign staff
- Media buys
The committee appeared to rely heavily on volunteer support and in-kind contributions rather than expensive professional campaign infrastructure during the first reporting window.
